Reading Passage
155 words
The secondary school canteen in Singapore is usually a symphony of clattering trays, the aromatic steam of chicken rice, and the high-pitched hum of adolescent chatter. It is a place of vibrant social exchange, yet for some, it becomes an arena of profound isolation. Social boycotting, a form of relational aggression, manifests not through physical blows, but through the chilling weapon of deliberate exclusion.
When a group collectively decides to “ignore” a peer, the victim is left in a social vacuum. While the surrounding tables are packed with students sharing jokes and meals, one student sits anchored to a bench, surrounded by empty seats that feel like a physical barrier. This “silent treatment” is often harder to identify than verbal bullying, as there are no obvious insults to report. However, the psychological impact is deep, signaling to the individual that they are invisible and unwanted. In the heart of a crowded school, the loneliest place can often be found right in the middle of the lunch rush.
PSLE Oral Practice: Stimulus-Based Conversation (PEEL Method)

1. How do you think the student sitting alone is feeling?
Point: I believe the student sitting alone is feeling incredibly dejected and deeply hurt by the social exclusion he is experiencing.
Evidence: In the image, his head is bowed, his shoulders are slumped, and he is staring blankly at his food while a large group of his peers sits just a few meters away, laughing and talking.
Explanation: This body language suggests a sense of worthlessness and shame. In a communal setting like a Singapore school canteen, where the culture is centered around eating together, being the only one without a companion makes his isolation feel much more public and painful. He likely feels like an outcast who is being intentionally ignored.
Link: Therefore, his downcast posture clearly reflects the heavy emotional toll that social boycotting takes on a person’s self-esteem.
2. In your opinion, why are the other students not inviting him to join them?
Point: I think the other students are likely influenced by a “herd mentality” and a fear of being socially ostracized themselves if they choose to include him.
Evidence: The group on the left is huddled closely together, and some students are even whispering or looking in his direction, yet no one is making a move to bridge the gap.
Explanation: In a school environment, social status is very important to teenagers. If the “leaders” of the group have decided to boycott this student, others may follow suit because they are afraid that by showing him kindness, they will become the next targets of the bully. They prioritize their own social safety over doing what is morally right.
Link: As a result, the fear of losing their own place in the group prevents them from reaching out to someone who is clearly in need of a friend.
3. What can schools do to encourage a more inclusive environment during recess?
Point: Schools can implement structured “Buddy Systems” or teacher-led inclusive activities to break down these social barriers.
Evidence: Just as we have “Cyber Wellness” or “Character and Citizenship Education” (CCE) lessons in Singapore, schools can create physical “Buddy Benches” or designated inclusive zones in the canteen.
Explanation: By normalizing the act of sitting with different people, the school reduces the social “risk” of being a bystander who helps. When teachers or student leaders actively model inclusive behavior, it sets a standard that kindness is valued more than popularity. This makes it easier for a student who wants to be a “Upstander” to actually take action without fear of being teased.
Link: Ultimately, by creating a culture where inclusion is rewarded, schools can transform the canteen from a place of potential bullying into a space of genuine community.


